Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 08:32
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Is the Shia claim true that Imam Ali was born inside the Kaaba?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
YouTube Will Add an AI Slop Button Thanks to Google’s Veo 3 - Gizmodo
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What are the signs of mild autism in a child?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The solar system as we know it may change forever - Notebookcheck
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
NASA withdraws support for conferences - SpaceNews
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Do you like to wear a see-through skirt?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
World’s most popular TikTok star Khaby Lame leaves the U.S. after being detained by ICE - ABC News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Pure Orwell: Europe condemns Iran for attacks on its own territory - Responsible Statecraft